An appeal may be filed with the Ombudsman under PFRDA (Redressal of Subscriber Grievance) Regulations, 2015, by a complainant- (a). whose grievance has not been resolved within 30 days from its escalation by filing a complaint with the National Pension System Trust (NPST); or (b). where a complaint has been made directly against the NPST (and no other intermediary), and the same is not resolved within the specified period of 30 days; or (c). in relation to a complaint against any other pension scheme regulated by the Authority, whose grievance is not resolved within a period of 30 days from its filing.
The Appeal to the Ombudsman has to be filed in writing duly signed by the complainant or his authorized representative. However, a legal practitioner cannot file Appeal on behalf of a complainant. The Appeal has to be filed in the specified format (Annexure B). An appeal can be filed against the decision of NPST within 45 days of the receipt of the response from NPST.
I. The Appeal would be accepted only if:
(a). prior to its filing, a complaint was made to the concerned intermediary and the same was either rejected or not replied to within 30 days and
(b). thereafter, the complaint was escalated to NPST and not resolved within 30 days; or
(c). if the complaint is against NPST itself, the same is not resolved by NPST within 30 days of its receipt.
II. Ombudsman can reject the Appeal if:
(a). the Appeal is not filed within 45 days from the date of receipt of response of the NPST with which the complainant is dissatisfied, or
(b). the Appeal is not filed within the next 45 days following the date of expiry of 30 days from the date of filing of the complaint with the NPST, and for which no response was received from NPST. Provided that the Ombudsman may entertain an Appeal beyond the specified period of 45 days, on sufficient reasons being provided by the complainant/Appellant.
(c). the Appeal is in respect of a subject matter, which has already been settled by Ombudsman in any other previous proceedings.
(d). the Appeal pertains to the same subject matter for which any proceedings before the Authority or any court, tribunal or any other forum, is pending or a decree or award or final order has already been passed.
III. An appeal may be dismissed if it is frivolous in the opinion of Ombudsman.
The Ombudsman sends a notice along with a copy of the Appeal to the intermediary or NPST as the case may be, named in the Appeal and aims to resolve the complaint/grievance by engaging with both the parties. If, any amicable settlement or friendly settlement is arrived at between the parties, the Ombudsman passes an award within 30 days from the date of such settlement and directs the parties to perform their obligations as per the award.
Yes, An Ombudsman has powers to call upon the intermediary, named in the Appeal, to provide the necessary and relevant information.
The Ombudsman maintains confidentiality of any information or document coming to his knowledge or possession in the course of discharging his duties. However, the Ombudsman can share the information with PFRDA or share the details of the award for the purpose of the publication in any journal or newspaper or for filing before any court, forum or, authority, if so required.
If the matter is not resolved by settlement within a period of 30 days of the receipt of the Appeal or such extended period as may be permitted by the Ombudsman, he may based upon the material placed before him and after hearing both the parties, pass his award in writing or pass any other directions or orders as he may consider appropriate.
The provisions of the Evidence Act, 1872 do not apply in the proceedings before Ombudsman and as such an Ombudsman may determine his own procedure consistent with the principles of Natural Justice.
The Ombudsman may decide whether to hold the proceedings on the basis of documents and other materials or hold oral hearings for the presentation of evidence. It is not necessary for a subscriber to be present at the oral hearing of proceedings.
90 days from the date of the filing of the Appeal.
The Ombudsman can award (including compensation and interest, if any) up to a maximum of Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten lacs). If the amount exceeds Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lacs), such order/award is sent to PFRDA for confirmation. The Designated Member of PFRDA may confirm or vary the order/award, after hearing the parties concerned.
(a). Within 15 days from the receipt of the award, a party, with notice to the other party, may request the Ombudsman to correct any computation errors, clerical or typographical errors or other errors of a similar nature occurring in the award.
(b). If the Ombudsman considers the request made, he shall make the correction within 15 days. The Ombudsman may also correct an error as referred to in (a) above, on his own, within 15 days from the date of the award.
Any party aggrieved by the award passed by the Ombudsman may, within 30 days from the receipt of the award or corrected award, file an application for revision before the PFRDA, setting out the grounds for revision of the award. The award of Ombudsman is final and binding on the parties and persons claiming under them except when revised by the designated member of PFRDA, after which there would be no further revision. The award of Ombudsman may be revised by the designated member of the PFRDA, only if there is a substantial miscarriage of justice, or there is an error apparent on the face of the award.
An aggrieved party who is directed to pay the amount mentioned in the award to the other party may file revision. Such application for revision is not entertained by the designated member of PFRDA unless the party filing the revision has deposited with the Authority, 75 % of the amount mentioned in the award. However, the designated member of the Authority may waive or reduce the amount to be deposited, after recording the reasons in writing. The designated member of the Authority may revise the award and pass such order, as it may deem appropriate.
PFRDA follows the principles of natural justice in the matter for disposing of an application for revision.
The directed party is obligated to implement an award of the Ombudsman or an order of the Designated Member of PFRDA, as the case may be, within 30 days of its receipt.
In such a case, the party will be deemed to have failed to redress subscribers’ grievances and may be liable for —
(a). Suspension or cancellation of certificate of registration; or
(b). Such other action permissible and deemed appropriate by PFRDA after following the procedure laid down under the relevant rules or regulations.
The entity shall be liable to a penalty of not more than one crore rupees or five times the amount of profits made or losses avoided, whichever is higher as defined under Section 28 of PFRDA Act 2013.
Please refer to Annexure B.
No. The appeal is liable to be rejected in not in the prescribed format.
No. However, the Ombudsman may impose a cost on the complainant for filing a complaint or, any application for correction, which is frivolous.
Every intermediary under the NPS is required to display the name and address of the Ombudsman as specified by PFRDA so that subscribers visiting their office premises can readily notice it. The intermediary or entity is also required to give full disclosure about the Grievance Redressal Mechanism through the Ombudsman in its offer document or subscriber's agreements, notifications, office memorandum, circulars etc. Any failure to disclose the grievance redressal mechanism through the Ombudsman by an intermediary may attract the penal provisions contained in subsection (3) of Section 28 of the Act. Can one appeal against the decision of designated member? Yes. Any appeal against the order passed by the designated member of the Authority under this regulation shall lie with the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), in terms of Section 36 of the PFRDA Act 2013.
© 2025 Abhipra